Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss Following Flapless Guided Versus Conventional Implant Placement
NCT07663045 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10
Last updated 2026-06-23
Summary
Marginal bone preservation is an important determinant of long-term implant success. Conventional flap implant placement provides direct visualization of the surgical site but may disturb the periosteal blood supply and contribute to early crestal bone remodeling.
Flapless guided implant placement is a minimally invasive approach that aims to preserve soft tissue architecture and vascular integrity. CBCT allows three-dimensional evaluation of peri implant bone levels, including mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual aspects.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare flapless guided implant placement with conventional flap implant placement in terms of marginal bone loss, implant stability, postoperative pain, and soft-tissue healing.
Conditions
- Guided Implant Placement
- Delayed Implant
- CBCT Segmentation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Flap Implant Placement
manually raising the gingival tissue during dental implant surgery, this surgical procedure involves the placement of a dental implant directly into the alveolar or basal bone during a single session followed by the placement of a healing abutment without the use of surgical guides or advanced technology.
- PROCEDURE
-
Flapless guided implant
a minimally invasive dental implant procedure where a surgical guide, often created using advanced imaging techniques like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computer-aided design (CAD), directs the precise placement of dental implants without the need for traditional flap elevation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Gulf Medical University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-07-01
- Completion
- 2026-07-30
Countries
- United Arab Emirates
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Midfacial Gingival Margin Changes Following Immediate Implants.
NCT05975515 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Changes After Immediate Implant Placement or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone
NCT03690973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Investigate New Surgical Techniques to Improve Esthetics and Patient Satisfaction at Implant Sites
NCT04101552 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Labial Bone Thickness Change in Immediate Implant Placement In Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT07509476 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Ice Cream Cone Technique With Immediate Implant Placement in Patients With Labial Plate Dehiscence
NCT04679766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement Utilizing Vestibular Flap Versus Single Flap Approach With Bone Graft
NCT06207565 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flapless Versus Flap Technique for Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss and Osseointegration of Dental Implants
NCT07159529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Completely Versus Partially Guided Zygomatic Implant
NCT06227351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implants in Maxillary Premolar Region Using Xenograft vs Allograft
NCT03716323 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Island Osteoperiosteal Flap Versus Ridge Splitting for Anterior Atrophic Maxillary
NCT07103577 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Facial Gingival Level Evaluation Following Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CTG Around Immediate Dental Implants vs Immediate Dental Implants Alone in the Esthetic Zone.
NCT03334994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Volumetric Changes of Labial Soft Tissue Contour Following Different Approaches with Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04310449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Changes Around Dental Implant Placed With Open vs. Closed Sinus Elevation
NCT06811337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Evaluation of Facial Bone Changes After Early Implant Placement Protocols "Clinically and Radiographically".
NCT06165913 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy With Immediate Implant Placement in Vertically Deficient Anterior Maxilla
NCT04006678 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Nanobone Versus Xenograft
NCT03536260 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flapless Mini-incision Implant Surgery
NCT07008079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss Using Computer Guided Ridge Splitting Technique With Simultaneous Implant Placement.
NCT03989193 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Labial Bone Thickness Around Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone Following a Novel Socket Evaluation System
NCT06648135 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Socket Shield Technique Versus Allograft Buccal Sheet Technique on Alveolar Bone Resorption After Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06566001 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Autogenous Maxillary Tuberosity Graft in the Esthetic Zone
NCT07460076 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE
NCT02992366 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Vertical Implant Position on the Marginal Bone Loss in Thick Versus Thin Phenotype.
NCT06177275 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA