MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Immediate Changes in Cervical Range of Motion Following Cervical Extension and Downslip Mobilizations.

NCT07656285 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 128

Last updated 2026-06-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy seated cervical extension glides vs supine downslip glides, on both cervical rotation range of motion and patient comfort. Information gathered from this study may be used to help clinicians determine the most beneficial methods of cervical mobilizations as a rehabilitation tool.

Conditions

  • Cervical Disease

Interventions

OTHER

Cervical Downslip Mobilization

Mobilization in supine on the C2-3 articular pillar in a direction that is caudal-medial-ventral.

OTHER

Seated Cervical Extension Glide

Mobilization of C2 on C3 in a direction that is dorsal, lateral, and caudal.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Missouri State University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-06-12
Primary Completion
2026-09-28
Completion
2026-09-28

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07656285 on ClinicalTrials.gov