Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mobilization and Manipulation of the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

NCT00128869 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96

Last updated 2008-05-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare whether or not there is a difference in the effectiveness of upper back (thoracic spine) mobilizations versus manipulations used in a population of patients with mechanical neck pain. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving a manipulative technique will experience better outcomes than patients receiving the mobilization techniques and these results will be evident at a 48-hour follow-up.

Conditions

  • Neck Pain

Interventions

PROCEDURE

spine mobilizations

PROCEDURE

spine manipulations

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Newton-Wellesley Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Paul E Glynn, DPT, OCS · Newton-Wellesley Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-05-31
Primary Completion
2007-10-31
Completion
2007-10-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00128869 on ClinicalTrials.gov