Predicting Allograft Volume in Orthopedic Oncology: Hemielipsoid Formula vs Intraoperative Fluid-Fill Measurement
NCT07653178 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-06-30
Summary
Bone defects following primary musculoskeletal tumor resection are frequently reconstructed using structural allografts. Allograft availability is limited, and intraoperative waste due to oversized graft selection remains a practical challenge in orthopedic oncology. Accurate preoperative estimation of the expected defect volume is therefore critical not only for surgical planning but also for minimizing unnecessary allograft use.
This prospective study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the preoperative hemielipsoid formula in estimating bone defect volume after primary musculoskeletal tumor resection, using intraoperative fluid displacement as the reference standard. A secondary aim is to determine whether preoperative CT-based hemielipsoid volume calculation can reliably guide allograft selection and reduce intraoperative graft waste.
Patients scheduled for primary musculoskeletal tumor resection with structural allograft reconstruction at Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital will be enrolled. Preoperative defect volume will be estimated using the hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) derived from preoperative CT measurements. Intraoperative defect volume will be measured by fluid displacement as the reference standard. Agreement between methods will be assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Conditions
- Bone Neoplasms
- Musculoskeletal Neoplasms
- Bone Transplantation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Hemielipsoid Formula-Based Preoperative and Intraoperative Bone Defect Volume Estimation
Preoperative bone defect volume is estimated by the operating surgeon using the hemielipsoid formula (V = 4/3 × π × a × b × c / 2) applied to routine preoperative CT imaging. The three principal dimensions of the anticipated resection defect are measured on axial, coronal, and sagittal CT reconstructions. Intraoperative defect volume is measured by saline cavity fill displacement as the reference standard. No additional procedures beyond standard surgical care are performed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sakarya University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-01
- Completion
- 2027-07-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Femoral Cartilage Thickness In Patients With Lower Limb Amputation
NCT04422717 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Unilateral vs Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00764335 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Evaluation of Moment Tumor Hip Replacement Products
NCT05847868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Osteotomy Of The Total Hip Replacement
NCT06209255 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Superior and Inferior Capsulotomy in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using Posterior Approach
NCT04719936 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gait and Balance Parameters Before and After Parathyroidectomy in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism
NCT03713671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty: Fluoroscopy vs Freehand
NCT05653687 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Cephalo-medullary Fixation to Treat Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
NCT05134805 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Relationship Between Thicknesses and Isokinetic Strength of Hip Flexor and Extensor Muscles
NCT05827744 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Relationship Between Gait and Severity of Femoroacetabular Impingement
NCT06536088 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Musculoskeletal Tumor Patients With Distal Femoral Megaprostheses
NCT06282198 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intraoperative Measurement Technique
NCT06173557 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Video Feedback-Supported Rehabilitation After Bilateral Femoral Lengthening
NCT07731022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Proximal Humerus Reconstruction After Resection for Tumors : Comparison Between Allograft Prosthetic Composite and Cement Sleeve Prosthetic Composite
NCT06382779 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Predicting of Frailty
NCT07332052 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Does Capsulectomy, Performed in Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Direct Anterior Approach Cause Knee Extension Strength Loss?
NCT04500093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Perioperative Strategies on the Extent of in Orthopaedic Prosthetic Surgery
NCT07500350 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
How Spinopelvic Movements Affect Hip Function After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06711042 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sacroplasty for Sacral Insufficiency Fractures.
NCT07493564 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
HIP: Hip Imaging Protocol
NCT04126161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Osteogenic Potential of Multipotent Cells From Different Anatomical Regions
NCT03369457 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Bipolar Versus Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Patients With a Hip Fracture
NCT00317837 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tıpmed™ Primary Hip Prosthesis System
NCT07651735 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Anterolateral Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT01484405 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Length of the Femoral Stem in Arthroplasty Done for Patients With Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesion
NCT04660591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA