Anterolateral Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture

NCT01484405 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16

Last updated 2014-11-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There are two surgical approaches (incision types) used by surgeons who do total hip replacements. The purpose of this study is to determine which type of surgical approach (incision type) produces the best results for patients who have a total hip replacement.

Null Hypothesis : There is no difference in complication rate, functional outcome, surgical time, or blood loss when comparing outcomes in patients receiving THA to hemiarthroplasty or ORIF for femoral neck fractures.

Conditions

  • Femur Fracture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

posterior approach

Surgical approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty

PROCEDURE

anterolateral approach

anterolateral surgical approach

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Orthopaedic Trauma Association

    collaborator OTHER
  • Florida Orthopaedic Institute

    lead NETWORK

Principal Investigators

  • David Watson, MD · Florida Orthopaedic Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-06-30
Primary Completion
2013-11-30
Completion
2013-11-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01484405 on ClinicalTrials.gov