Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced MRI and FDG-PET/CT in Spinal Pathology: Image Quality and Short-Term Renal-Hematologic Safety

NCT07640386 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2026-06-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This prospective comparative observational study evaluates image quality characteristics and short-term physiological effects associated with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with cervical and lumbar spinal pathologies.

A total of 120 adult participants undergo either contrast-enhanced MRI or FDG-PET/CT as part of routine clinical evaluation. Image quality is assessed using quantitative metrics, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), as well as qualitative Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) performed by blinded radiologists. Short-term physiological effects are evaluated using blood urea nitrogen (BUN), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and hemoglobin measurements obtained before imaging and 48 hours after imaging.

The study aims to compare image quality characteristics and short-term physiological parameters associated with these imaging modalities and to examine the influence of age group and spinal region on imaging performance.

Conditions

  • Short-Term Renal-Hematologic Safety
  • Contrast-Enhanced MRI and FDG-PET/CT
  • Spinal Pathology

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-04-05
Primary Completion
2025-11-03
Completion
2026-01-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07640386 on ClinicalTrials.gov