Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Thoracic Myofascial Pain
NCT07632820 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 76
Last updated 2026-06-08
Summary
Chronic thoracic (mid-back) pain can be difficult to treat, and there is limited evidence to guide the use of injection therapies for pain arising from muscles and surrounding soft tissues. Two commonly used treatments are trigger point injections (TPI) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks, but no studies have directly compared their effectiveness for chronic thoracic myofascial pain. The purpose of this study is to compare pain relief, physical function, emotional well-being, patient satisfaction, and safety following treatment with either an ESP block or TPI. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. Researchers will follow participants for up to 12 weeks after the procedure and collect information through questionnaires and pain assessments.
Conditions
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine
Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the thoracic level corresponding to the location of maximal pain. Under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge needle will be advanced into the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Participants will receive 5 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine per side, with bilateral injections performed when clinically indicated for bilateral thoracic pain.
- DRUG
-
Trigger Point Injection (TPI) with 0.5% Plain Bupivacaine
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided trigger point injection(s) into the thoracic paraspinal musculature at the site(s) of maximal tenderness. Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5% plain bupivacaine will be injected in volumes of 1-2 mL per injection site, with a maximum total volume of 5 mL per side and up to five injection sites per laterality.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
collaborator OTHER -
Ohio State University
collaborator OTHER -
University of Maryland, Baltimore
collaborator OTHER - lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ryan D'Souza, MD · Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2029-08-01
- Completion
- 2029-08-30
- FDA Drug
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Multi-modal Imaging of Myofascial Pain - Phase 2
NCT07322445 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sympatholytic Effect of Thoracic ESP
NCT05723393 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment in Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care
NCT04703803 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Trigger Point Dry Needling With Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation
NCT03539588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for the Relief of Chronic Pain in Cases of Degenerative Disc Diseases.
NCT07256132 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Electrolysis Versus Dry Needling in Levator Scapulae
NCT04157426 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPI) in Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04290221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transforaminal Epidural Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
NCT05129085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Neurological Effects of Dry Needling in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT02179320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trigger Point Electroacupuncture Treatment in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06868173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cutaneous Silent Period-Based Comparison of DRG-PRF and TFESI in Lumbar Radicular Pain
NCT07097532 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cryoablation Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain After Thoracotomy and Thoracoscopy
NCT06384664 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Preference and Long-term Outcomes in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Study Comparing Spinal Cord Stimulation to Intrathecal Drug Delivery.
NCT07091123 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Steroids Versus Gabapentin
NCT01495923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mitochondrial Function in Myofascial Trigger Points Cohort Pilot Study Using High-resolution Respirometry
NCT03704311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Experience Comparing Tonic Vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation For Chronic Pain
NCT04159753 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Medical Management for Low Back Pain (DISTINCT)
NCT04479787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Flail Chest
NCT03413059 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Caudal Epidural Steroid and Trigger Point Injection
NCT05792111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Lumbar Facet Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Versus Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Lumbar Facet-Mediated Pain
NCT07692737 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Paraspinal Stimulation in Treating MPS
NCT01708343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Back
NCT04538430 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Massage and Electroacupuncture in Chronic Lumbar Pain
NCT04108546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Anatomic Versus Targeted Lead Placement for Burst Stimulation Therapy During the Trial
NCT03277378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Benefits of Dry Needling for Low Back Pain When Combined With Regular Treatment
NCT06791434 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4