Diferences in 3D Gait Analysis After Various Types of Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT07630519 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2026-06-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients with hip osteoarthritis who were indicated for total hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either a short (metaphyseal) stem or a conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem hip arthroplasty. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed regularly (preoperatively and at multiple postoperative time points) to determine whether conservative implants result in superior objective and patient-reported outcomes

Conditions

  • Arthropathy of Hip

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conservative Total Hip Arthroplasty

Conservative (metaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

PROCEDURE

Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

Conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
45 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-09-30
Primary Completion
2025-01-30
Completion
2025-01-30

Countries

  • Czechia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07630519 on ClinicalTrials.gov