MedTrace Logo

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Cauterization From the Origin Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT07601971 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44

Last updated 2026-05-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main goal of this study is to compare between total Laparoscopic hysterectomy proceeded by Uterine artery cauterization at its origin and conventional total Laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding: bleeding , operative time , intra operative time and follow up post operative.

Conditions

  • Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1

Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1

PROCEDURE

Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy to arm 2

Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy

PROCEDURE

Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional uterine artery ligation

Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with ligation of uterine artery beside uterus is considered conventional and may cause more blood loss and take more time

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kafrelsheikh University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Max Age
55 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-05-15
Primary Completion
2027-05-15
Completion
2027-06-15

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07601971 on ClinicalTrials.gov