MedTrace Logo

Clinical Trial on the Methodology of Hysterosalpingography: a Comparative Study

NCT07583758 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 251

Last updated 2026-05-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Different techniques have been developed to optimize hysterosalpingography (HSG) methodology. Our aim is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these three different techniques in terms of both patient satisfaction and clinician's interpretation. The medical records of the patients who are treated in our hospital between 2020 and 2022 are investigated based on the eligibility criteria.

Conditions

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Hysterosalpingography - Metal Cannula Method

Different techniques of hysterosalpingography (HSG) were applied for 3 groups in parallel.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Hysterosalpingography - Active Balloon Method

Different techniques of hysterosalpingography (HSG) were applied for 3 groups in parallel.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Hysterosalpingography - Passive Balloon Method

Different techniques of hysterosalpingography (HSG) were applied for 3 groups in parallel.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Medipol University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gulseren Polat, M.D. · Medipol University

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-01
Primary Completion
2022-08-31
Completion
2026-04-25

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07583758 on ClinicalTrials.gov