Comparison of Single-Visit Endodontic Treatment Outcomes Using Continuous Wave Condensation and Single-Cone Obturation Techniques

NCT07562139 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56

Last updated 2026-05-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two root canal obturation techniques for endodontic treatment in patients aged 15 to 56 years with irreversible pulpitis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does continuous wave condensation differ from the single-cone technique in obturation time?
2. Does continuous wave condensation differ from the single-cone technique in obturation quality, postoperative pain, and 6-month treatment success? Researchers will compare continuous wave condensation with single-cone obturation to see whether one technique provides better sealing quality, shorter treatment time, less postoperative pain, or higher clinical success.

Participants will:

* Receive endodontic treatment for teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.
* Undergo root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue R25.
* Have canals obturated using either continuous wave condensation or the single-cone technique.
* Be evaluated for obturation time, radiographic quality immediately after treatment, postoperative pain at 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and clinical-radiographic outcome at 6 months.

Conditions

  • Irreversible Pulpitis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Continuous Wave Condensation

Continuous Wave Condensation (CWC) - Specific Protocol: * EQ-V system (Meta Biomed, South Korea) - NOT System B, Touch'n Heat, or generic pluggers * Precise heat activation: 230°C (manufacturer setting for optimal flow) * Cutting tip positioned 4-6 mm short of working length (prevents over-compaction) * Gutta-percha cone tip pre-trimmed 0.5-1 mm (ensures precise apical control) * Two-stage process: apical hand condensation + thermoplastic backfill * Time measured from cone insertion to final radiograph (includes verification)

PROCEDURE

Single-Cone

* Matched master cone to Reciproc Blue R25 preparation (size/exact tug-back) * Heat trimming at/below orifice (minimizes coronal excess vs cold cutting) * NO supplementary cones or lateral compaction (pure single-cone) * Sealer: AH Plus (Dentsply) - not bioceramic or other brands

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-06-01
Primary Completion
2024-12-01
Completion
2025-06-01

Countries

  • Vietnam

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07562139 on ClinicalTrials.gov