Closed Versus Open Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT07496216 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2026-03-27
Summary
This randomized controlled trial will compare closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) under spinal anesthesia in patients with chronic anal fissure. The study will evaluate wound healing rates, postoperative pain, return to work, anal incontinence, and recurrence. A total of 160 patients will be randomized equally to either closed LIS or open LIS. The primary outcome will be complete wound healing at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes include pain at 24 hours measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), return to work (days), anal incontinence at 6 weeks and 1 year, and recurrence at 1 year. Multivariate analysis will identify independent predictors of non-healing.
Conditions
- Chronic Anal Fissure
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
A bivalve anal retractor will be inserted to visualize the intersphincteric groove. A number 11 scalpel blade will be introduced into the intersphincteric groove in the left lateral position, advanced to the level of the dentate line, and then rotated medially to divide the internal anal sphincter. A dry gauze wick soaked with xylocaine gel will be placed in the anal canal for hemostasis and removed on the evening of the operation day.
- PROCEDURE
-
Open Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
A 1-2 cm curvilinear incision will be made in the intersphincteric groove in the left lateral position. The intersphincteric plane will be dissected to expose the internal anal sphincter, which will then be divided under direct vision up to the level of the dentate line. The wound will be left open to heal by secondary intention.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Services Hospital, Lahore
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Awais Amjad Malik, MBBS, FCPS · Services Institute of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-02-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-01-15
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Surgical Treatment of a Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT05117697 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Fissurectomy to Fissurectomy With Anoplasty
NCT04911023 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Rerouting Seton Versus LIFT for Complex Anal Fistula
NCT04616911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Prolene Thread Seton Vs Silk Thread Seton for the Treatment of Perianal Fistula
NCT03763981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Dose Multiple Site Injection of Botox Versus Lateral Sphincterotomy in Chronic Analfissure
NCT04166175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Track (LIFT) Versus Fistulectomy in Trans-sphincteric Anal Ffistula.
NCT04351074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT02395809 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Method of Surgical Treatment of Anal Fissure
NCT07268261 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Laser and Open Fistula Surgeries in the Management of Fistula - In - Ano
NCT07083778 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Haemorrhoidectomy With vs Without Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
NCT07360912 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Injections of Botulinum Toxin and Topical Nitroglycerin Ointment for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT05590520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two Approaches to Lower the Chances of Recurrence of Anal Fistula After Surgery
NCT06380036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT00830661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study: Fistula Rerouting vs. LIFT for High Perianal Fistula
NCT07399353 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Inter-sphincteric Fistula Tract for Management of Anal Fistula
NCT05314205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study Between Delorme Operation With or Without Postanal Repair in Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT01656369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postero-lateral Internal Sphincterotomy vs Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT03920449 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Coring Out Fistulectomy With Closure of Internal Sphincter Opening Versus Lay Open Fistulotomy and Primary Sphincter Repair in Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula
NCT06478615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoidectomy Only Versus Hemorrhoidectomy With Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
NCT06588374 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele
NCT02659176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transsphincteric Fistula Management Using LIFT and MAF
NCT06616662 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Delorme's Operation in Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT02601326 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fistulotomy Versus Fistulotomy With Marsupialization
NCT05660876 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Versus Rectal Advancement Flap in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula
NCT05263661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure
NCT05598164 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA