MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness of an AI Scribe Compared to Routine Templates for Clinical Documentation in Orthopedic Consultations

NCT07489469 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2026-03-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized study compares AI-generated clinical documentation with traditional dictation templates during orthopedic consultations. Patients are randomized to have their consultation documented using either an AI medical scribe or a routine dictation template. Outcomes include surgeon documentation time, administrative processing time, time from consultation to note delivery to the family physician, patient satisfaction, and documentation accuracy.

Conditions

  • Clinical Documentation
  • Artifical Intelligence

Interventions

OTHER

AI Medical Scribe

Use of an artificial intelligence-based medical scribe for automated clinical documentation

OTHER

Routine Dictation Template

Standard clinical documentation using surgeon dictation templates and administrative transcription

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Saskatchewan

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-06-18
Primary Completion
2026-01-30
Completion
2026-01-30

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07489469 on ClinicalTrials.gov