Routine Versus Provisional Distal Perfusion Catheter Placement in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support

NCT07482865 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 500

Last updated 2026-03-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized controlled, superiority trial to compare clinical outcomes between routine distal perfusion catheter (DPC) insertion versus provisional distal perfusion catheter (DPC) insertion in the occurrence of sign or symptom of acute limb ischemia in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) through femoral artery approach.

Conditions

  • Cardiogenic Shock
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction of Inferior Wall
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Myocarditis
  • Acute Limb Ischemia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Distal perfusion catheter insertion

Distal perfusion catheter insertion under fluoroscopy or ultrasouond guidance in ipsilateral femoral artery to prevent limb ischemia.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Samsung Medical Center

    lead OTHER
  • Korea University Anam Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Samsung Changwon Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Kwandong University Intl. ST. Mary's Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN

Principal Investigators

  • Jeong Hoon Yang, MD, PhD · Samsung Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-05-01
Primary Completion
2030-08-31
Completion
2030-10-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07482865 on ClinicalTrials.gov