Comparison of Three Treatment Strategies for Traumatic AO Type A1 Vertebral Fractures

NCT07471568 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 146

Last updated 2026-03-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This retrospective study evaluates three different treatment approaches used for traumatic AO Spine Type A1 (A1) vertebral fractures: orthopedic bracing, percutaneous vertebroplasty, and spinal arthrodesis. Traumatic A1 fractures are stable compression fractures that occur after high-energy events such as falls, traffic accidents, or heavy lifting. These injuries often affect working-age adults and can lead to significant pain, temporary disability, and delays in returning to work. The study analyzes real-world clinical data from patients treated at Hospital 9 de Octubre in Valencia, Spain, between 2007 and 2025. Outcomes assessed include pain levels, duration of sick leave, time to return to work, final functional status, and the presence of complications. By comparing the results of these three treatment strategies, the study aims to identify which approach offers the best clinical recovery and work-related outcomes for patients with traumatic AO Spine Type A1 fractures.

Conditions

  • Traumatic Vertebral Fractures
  • Compression Fractures of the Spine
  • AO Type A1 Vertebral Fracture
  • Spinal Trauma

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Valencia

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-03-01
Primary Completion
2025-02-28
Completion
2027-02-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07471568 on ClinicalTrials.gov