Influence of Implant Insertion Depth on Peri-implant Bone Changes Around Short Implants
NCT07468747 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 58
Last updated 2026-03-13
Summary
Dental implants are widely used to replace missing teeth and restore oral function and aesthetics. One of the key factors affecting the long-term success of dental implants is the stability of the bone surrounding the implant, particularly the crestal bone around the implant neck. Implant insertion depth relative to the alveolar crest may influence peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone remodeling.
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the influence of implant placement depth on peri-implant health and radiographic bone changes around short dental implants placed using guided surgical protocol. All implants will be placed using the Bicon Implant System following computer-guided implant planning and surgical guide fabrication to ensure precise implant positioning.
Participants requiring implant therapy will be randomly allocated into two groups. In the test group, implants will be placed 2 mm below the crestal bone level (subcrestal placement). In the control group, implants will be placed at the crestal bone level (crestal placement). Implant placement will be performed using guided implant surgery to standardize surgical positioning and minimize variability in implant angulation and depth.
Clinical parameters related to peri-implant health, including Modified Plaque Index, Implant Mucosal Index, Peri-implant Mucosal Tissue Index and Probing Depth during follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months. In addition, standardized radiographic examinations will be performed to measure peri-implant Crestal bone level changes at 12 months.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether subcrestal implant placement (2 mm below the bone crest) results in improved preservation of peri-implant crestal bone compared with crestal implant placement. Secondary outcomes will include assessment of peri-implant soft tissue health and overall implant stability.
The findings of this study may help clarify the optimal implant insertion depth for short implants placed using guided surgery and may contribute to improving long-term implant success and peri-implant tissue stability.
Conditions
- Tooth Loss
- Edentulism
- Peri-implant Bone Loss
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Subcrestal Dental Implant Placement
Placement of short dental implants using a computer-guided surgical protocol with the implant positioned 2 mm below the alveolar crest (subcrestal placement). Implant placement will be performed using a surgical guide following digital implant planning to standardize implant position, angulation, and insertion depth. Short implants from the Bicon Implant System will be used. Postoperative evaluation will include clinical assessment of peri-implant health parameters (Modified Plaque Index, Implant Mucosal Index, Peri-implant Mucosal Tissue Index, and Probing Depth) at 3, 6, and 12 months, and radiographic assessment of peri-implant crestal bone level changes at 12 months.
- PROCEDURE
-
Crestal Dental Implant Placement
Placement of short dental implants using a computer-guided surgical protocol with the implant positioned at the level of the alveolar crest (crestal placement). Implant placement will be performed using a surgical guide following digital implant planning to standardize implant position, angulation, and insertion depth. Short implants from the Bicon Implant System will be used. Clinical evaluation of peri-implant health parameters (Modified Plaque Index, Implant Mucosal Index, Peri-implant Mucosal Tissue Index, and Probing Depth) will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months, and radiographic evaluation of peri-implant crestal bone level changes will be conducted at 12 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Gulf Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohamed Atef Sayed, Ph.D. · Gulf Medical University
-
Marwa Mahayni, M.D.S · Gulf Medical University
-
Hesham Marei, Ph.D. · Gulf Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-03-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-05-30
- Completion
- 2027-05-30
Countries
- United Arab Emirates
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Vertical Implant Position With Immediate Provisionalization on the Marginal Bone Loss.
NCT05973357 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Slopped Shoulder Implant Neck vs Conventional Implant Neck Design on Crestal Bone Level in the Maxilla
NCT03614442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability and Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Placed at Crestal Versus Subcrestal Level in Controlled Type Two Diabetic Patients
NCT05125445 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
OPG-RANKL Levels Around Short Implants
NCT02840773 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
NCT03714074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
NCT02814149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Dis/Reconnection of Implant Abutments on Peri-implant Bone Levels
NCT04043286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation In Bar
NCT06401200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants in the Anterior Maxilla
NCT07381283 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Class 1 Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06666595 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Subcrestal vs Juxtacrestal PRAMA Implants With Variable Necks
NCT07107464 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Concentrated Growth Factors on Short Implant-Supported Overdentures
NCT06880965 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluation of MBL Around Implants Placed in Crestal or Subcrestal Positions: a RCT
NCT03806608 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-gingival or Subcrestal Short Implants Posterior Maxilla Bone Changes
NCT05975138 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06643975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Platform Switched Implant and Bone Level Alteration
NCT02867982 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of the Implant Connection on Facial Tissues Maturation
NCT04160689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Extra-short (4 mm) Implants Used as Distal Support of a Maxillary Full-arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis vs. 10 mm Implants Installed After Sinus Floor Elevation.
NCT03958448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Survival Rate of 2 Implant-supported Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06447792 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Soft Tissue Thickness on Submerged and Non Submerged Implants
NCT02842385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Tooth-implant Supported Prostheses
NCT05712031 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Labial Bone Thickness Around Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone Following a Novel Socket Evaluation System
NCT06648135 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparative (Short vs. Standard) Length Implants in Early Stability Patterns.
NCT07162389 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Versus Delayed Loading for Implants Retaining Mandibular Complete Overdenture
NCT05620797 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA