Comparison of Anesthetic Techniques for Early Recovery After Ankle Arthroscopy

Summary

Ankle arthroscopy is increasingly performed as a day-case procedure, making rapid recovery and efficient discharge critical. Anesthetic technique substantially influences postoperative recovery, yet high-quality evidence comparing anesthetic strategies in ankle arthroscopy is limited.

This multicenter randomized trial compares total intravenous anesthesia with propofol plus peripheral nerve block (PNB), general anesthesia plus PNB, and spinal anesthesia, with PACU-I recovery time as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, opioid consumption, hospital length of stay, adverse events, recovery quality, satisfaction, limb weakness, and intraoperative hemodynamics.

Conditions

• Ankle Sprain
• Ankle (Ligaments); Instability (Old Injury)
• Pain Management
• ERAS
• Ankle Arthroscopy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Total intravenous anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve block (TIVA + PNB) group

Preoperatively, all patients received ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks using 0.375% ropivacaine, with a total volume of 30 mL: 20 mL was administered to the popliteal sciatic nerve, and 10 mL to the saphenous nerve. The success of the nerve block was determined by the attending anesthesiologist. Subsequently, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was induced and maintained. Induction was performed with propofol 1.0-2.0 mg/kg IV bolus, and maintenance was achieved using continuous infusion of propofol at 4.8-12 mg/kg/h, with optional co-administration of dexmedetomidine for sedation. Infusion rates were titrated by the anesthesiologist based on clinical parameters and surgical requirements.

PROCEDURE

General anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve block (GA + PNB) group

Similarly, patients received ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks preoperatively, using 0.375% ropivacaine with a total volume of 30 mL: 20 mL was injected around the popliteal sciatic nerve and 10 mL around the saphenous nerve. The effectiveness of the block was assessed by the attending anesthesiologist. General anesthesia (intravenous-inhalational or balanced anesthesia) was then induced with midazolam 1-2 mg, sufentanil 20-30 µg, etomidate 12-18 mg, and rocuronium 35-40 mg. Maintenance was achieved with sevoflurane inhalation at 0.5-2.5 vol%, in combination with continuous intravenous infusions of propofol (360-600 mg/h) and remifentanil (360-900 µg/h). Dosages were dynamically adjusted by the anesthesiologist based on hemodynamic parameters and anesthetic depth.

PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia

Spinal anesthesia was performed via subarachnoid block at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace, using 0.75% ropivacaine 2.5-3.5 mL (approximately 18-26 mg). If intraoperative sedation was required, propofol was continuously infused after confirmation of adequate anesthetic level, with the infusion discontinued before the end of surgery. Sedation depth was titrated by the anesthesiologist according to patient comfort and safety. If anesthesia or sedation was insufficient to ensure surgical safety or completion of the procedure, rescue conversion to general anesthesia was permitted based on clinical judgment. Such events were recorded as perioperative adverse events and protocol deviations, and included in safety and protocol adherence analyses. After surgery, all patients were transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) for recovery. Patients were discharged to the general ward once they achieved an Aldrete score ≥9. For spinal anesthesia patients, discharge from PACU required a regr

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

  lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Max Age

65 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2026-03-01

Primary Completion

2026-11-01

Completion

2026-12-30