MedTrace Logo

Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus

NCT02589288 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2017-08-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized , blinded study is to compare two different infusion techniques (continuous VS intermittent automatic bolus) to assess the effects of postoperative analgesia after Day-Case anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Conditions

  • Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Continuous Infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%

Postoperative continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0,2% at 6 ml/h and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).

PROCEDURE

Automatic Intermittent Bolus of ropivacaine 0.2%

Postoperative Automatic Intermittent Bolus of 6 ml Ropivacaine 0,2% every hour and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gianluca Cappelleri, MD · Study Principal Investigator

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-11-30
Primary Completion
2016-12-31
Completion
2017-03-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02589288 on ClinicalTrials.gov