Flow- Versus Volume-controlled Ventilation During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

NCT07453810 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2026-03-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

During robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), patients are placed under general anesthesia and supported with mechanical ventilation. In this study, the effects of two different ventilatory strategies-flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)-were compared. Using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to provide real-time assessment of lung status and to guide individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings, we investigated whether FCV offers superior oxygenation and improved respiratory system mechanics compared with VCV.

Conditions

  • Positive Pressure Ventilation

Interventions

DEVICE

Flow-Controlled Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation delivered in a flow-controlled mode with constant inspiratory and expiratory flow patterns

DEVICE

Volume-Controlled Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation delivered in a volume-controlled mode with constant tidal volume and decelerating inspiratory flow pattern.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-11-28
Primary Completion
2026-03-13
Completion
2026-03-20

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07453810 on ClinicalTrials.gov