A Study to Compare Elritercept With Epoetin Alfa to Treat Anemia in Adults With Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Who Need Regular Blood Transfusions

NCT07422480 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2026-03-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main aim of this study is to assess how elritercept works in lowering the need for RBC (red blood cell) transfusions and how safe elritercept is when compared with epoetin alfa. Other aims are to learn if elritercept improves tiredness as reported by participants without needing RBC transfusion compared with epoetin alfa, the RBC transfusion burden and quality of life compared with epoetin alfa. The study also aims to find out the extent of the immune response to elritercept. The study will also check on the medical problems (safety) of elritercept.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

Elritercept

Elritercept, SC, injection.

DRUG

Epoetin Alfa

Epoetin Alfa SC injection.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Study Director · Takeda

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-04-01
Primary Completion
2029-04-30
Completion
2033-10-01
FDA Drug
Yes

Countries

  • United States
  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • India
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Lithuania
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Romania
  • South Korea
  • Spain
  • Taiwan
  • Thailand
  • Turkey (Türkiye)
  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07422480 on ClinicalTrials.gov