Clinical Effectiveness Of Polishing Brush Compared To Ceramic Soft Tissue Trimming Bur In Gingival Depigmentation

Summary

Gingival hyperpigmentation, particularly of melanin origin, can pose significant aesthetic concerns, especially among patients with a high smile line. Several depigmentation techniques have been proposed to manage this condition, including scalpel surgery, electrosurgery, cryotherapy, lasers, and various rotary instruments. Recently, minimally invasive rotary tools such as ceramic burs and polishing brushes have gained interest due to their potential to deliver controlled ablation with reduced postoperative discomfort and healing complications.

Ceramic soft tissue trimming burs are specially designed to remove superficial pigmented gingival layers with minimal trauma. However, these instruments may still generate heat and cause a degree of tissue damage. On the other hand, polishing brushes, traditionally used for surface finishing and stain removal, have recently been explored for soft tissue applications due to their gentle action and adaptability.

Despite their increasing use, there is insufficient comparative clinical evidence on the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient-centered experiences between these two modalities in gingival depigmentation. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial design offers the advantage of eliminating inter-individual variability. Thus, this study aims to assess and compare the clinical effectiveness of the polishing brush and ceramic trimming bur for gingival depigmentation in terms of pigment reduction, healing outcomes, postoperative pain, and recurrence.

Conditions

• Gingival Hyperpigmentation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Gingival Depigmentation using polishing brush

gingival depigmentation will be performed using a polishing brush specifically adapted for soft tissue application. After administering local anesthesia, a silicon carbide or rubber-based polishing brush will be attached to a low-speed handpiece. The pigmented gingival epithelium will be gently abraded in a circular motion under light pressure until the superficial pigmented layer is removed and uniform pink gingiva is visible. Continuous irrigation with sterile saline will be used to prevent heat generation and ensure visibility. The operator will take care not to injure the underlying connective tissue. No periodontal dressing will be applied. Postoperative instructions will include gentle oral hygiene, avoiding hot or spicy foods, and use of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for 1 week.

PROCEDURE

Depigmentation using ceramic soft tissue trimming bur

ceramic soft tissue trimming burs will be used to perform gingival depigmentation. After achieving local anesthesia, a flame- or round-shaped ceramic bur will be attached to a low-speed contra-angle handpiece. The bur will be used in a brushing motion to carefully remove the pigmented epithelial layer without applying excessive pressure. The clinician will maintain light, controlled strokes to avoid damaging the underlying lamina propria. As with the polishing brush technique, continuous irrigation with saline will be provided to cool the tissue and improve visibility. Once the pigmented areas are cleared and a healthy pink gingival color is achieved, the procedure will be concluded without any periodontal dressing. Postoperative care will follow the same protocol as the polishing brush group.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Mona Darhous, Professor · Cairo Univeristy

• Maie Esmaiel, Lecturer · Cairo University

• Raghad Hamadh, Bachelor · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Max Age

40 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2025-11-01

Primary Completion

2026-12-31

Completion

2027-03-31

Countries

• Egypt

Study Locations