The Predictability of the Necessity for Cardiology Consultation in Patients Scheduled for Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models in Preoperative Anesthesia Assessment
NCT07395713 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 183
Last updated 2026-02-09
Summary
Structured Summary Title
Predictability of Cardiology Consultation Requirement in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models
Background
Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is essential for minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cardiology consultations are often requested to assess surgical eligibility and reduce complication risks. However, unnecessary consultations may contribute to inefficient healthcare resource utilization and procedural delays.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, have demonstrated potential in clinical decision support systems. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2024 guidelines provide a structured framework for evaluating perioperative cardiac risk. This study aims to investigate whether AI-based models can assist in predicting the need for cardiology consultation and to examine the effect of prompted versus non-prompted input formats on AI recommendations.
Study Design
Prospective, observational, comparative study.
Ethical Approval
The study has been approved by the Bursa City Hospital Ethics Committee and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Sample Size
Sample size was calculated using G\*Power software based on anticipated effect size and statistical power requirements.
Participants
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 18 years or older
ASA physical status I-IV
Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery
Evaluated by anesthesia residents with less than two years of clinical experience
Exclusion Criteria:
Pediatric patients
Patients declining participation
Incomplete clinical data
Data Collection
The following patient data will be recorded:
Demographics (age, sex, BMI)
Medical history (comorbidities, medication use, allergies, substance use)
Functional capacity (METs score)
ECG findings
Chest radiography findings
Planned surgical procedure characteristics
AI Model Evaluation
Multiple AI language models will be tested using standardized patient scenarios. Each scenario will be presented in two formats:
Prompted format:
"You are a 10-year experienced anesthesiologist. According to ESC 2024 guidelines, evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."
Non-prompted format:
"Evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."
AI recommendations will not influence clinical decision-making.
Outcome Measures
Primary and secondary analyses will include:
Agreement between AI recommendations and expert anesthesiologist evaluations
Readability of AI-generated responses
Quality assessment of responses
Classification performance comparisons across models
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses will be performed using appropriate comparative and agreement tests. Readability and quality scores will be analyzed using non-parametric methods where applicable. ROC analysis will be used to assess classification ability. A significance level of p \< 0.05 will be applied.
Study Objective
The objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of AI-assisted decision support systems in predicting cardiology consultation requirements and to evaluate whether prompt engineering influences AI performance.
Conditions
- USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ANESTHESIA
- PREOPERATIVE CARDIOLOGY CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Patient scenarios were presented to different AI models (ChatGPT 4.5, ChatGPT 5, Copilot, Deepseek, Grok, Claude, Gemini Flash, Gemini Pro) with and without prompts.
Responses: Compared with expert opinion according to the ESC 2024 guidelines Evaluated using the Ateşman readability score and the Global Quality Scale (GQS)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Bursa City Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
eralp çevikkalp · bursa şehir hastanesi
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-03-15
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Pre-Anesthetic Assessment
NCT07290647 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of AI-Generated Pain Scoring Visuals With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Assessment
NCT06456853 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Capabilities ofArtificial Intelligence Models in Externation Decision of Patient Who Followed in Intensive Care Unit ()
NCT06584890 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conversational AI Study
NCT06459479 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Human Doctors or AI: Evaluating Patient Satisfaction in Urinary Stone Disease Consultations
NCT07111845 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LLM-Guided Rehabilitation in Degenerative Knee Disease
NCT07267962 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Patient Use of Artificial Intelligence on Doctor-Patient Interaction and Clinical Outcomes in Endometriosis Consultations
NCT07393568 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Use of Artificial Intelligence by Urogynecologic Patients
NCT06481436 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of an Interactive Consulting System to Enhance Patients' Decision-making: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04262596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Smart Family Doctor" Assisted Comprehensive Management of Secondary Prevention Among Post Revascularization Patients
NCT07273513 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Research of AI Assistant Gastroscope Training
NCT04682821 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Accuracy of ChatGPT-4 in Interpreting Arterial Blood Gas Results
NCT06456866 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Advice by Physicians
NCT06980467 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ChatGPT -Based Intervention for Social Frailty in Older Women With CHF : Gender Differences
NCT07091435 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for ROTEM
NCT07043556 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Frequently Asked Questions From Osteoarthritis Patients
NCT07202286 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
AI Chatbot-Based Learning on Dry Eye and Eye Strain Knowledge
NCT06785155 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Perceived Empathy of an AI Chatbot for Atrial Fibrillation Education
NCT06684457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Care in War-Torn Sudan: Feasibility, Barriers, and Ethical Perspectives
NCT07149012 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Large Language Models To Improve the Quality of Care of Cardiology Patients
NCT06935253 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Learning Diagnostic Reasoning Through AI
NCT06754826 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ChatGPT Versus Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residents
NCT06775938 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
AI-generated Feedback in Social Robotic Virtual Patients
NCT07277829 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of AI Large Models for Diagnosis and Treatment in Real-World Cases: Multicenter Retrospective Study
NCT07378358 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-enabled Clinical Assistant to Support Thyroid Cancer Management
NCT07234539 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA