Comparison of Cumulative Opioid Consumption Between Variable-Rate Feedback Infusion and Fixed-Rate Basal Infusion Modes of Intravenous PCA Following Mixed Surgery

NCT07361822 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1170

Last updated 2026-05-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Perioperative pain management affects patient recovery. However, the rate of moderate to severe postoperative pain is as high as 73.8%, which hinders recovery and increases the risk of complications. Although opioids are the first-line analgesics, excessive use leads to adverse reactions. The traditional fixed-rate PCA mode is difficult to match the changes in postoperative pain. This study will compare different PCA mode optimization strategies, assuming that they can reduce opioid dosage, improve analgesic effect, and reduce adverse reactions, providing high-quality evidence-based basis for postoperative analgesia and promoting individualized and intelligent management.

Conditions

  • Surgery
  • Pain Management
  • Opioid Consumption
  • Patient-controlled Analgesia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Fixed-rate basal infusion mode

All participants received a standardized PCA solution containing sufentanil (100 μg), ondansetron (16 mg), and normal saline with total volume 100 mL. In conventional fixed-rate basal infusion mode group, the PCA was set to administer a bolus of 2 mL with a lock out interval of 15 minutes and background infusion rate 2 mL/h.

PROCEDURE

Variable-rate feedback infusion mode

All participants received a standardized PCA solution containing sufentanil (100 μg), ondansetron (16 mg), and normal saline with total volume 100 mL. In variable-rate feedback infusion mode group, a bolus of 2 mL with a lock out interval of 15 minutes and background infusion rate 2 mL/h, which increased to 2.5 mL/h, was used whenever the demand dose was administered within lock out interval. The background infusion rate automatically decreased by 0.5 mL/h when the bolus button was not pressed for 1 hour. The background infusion rate was limited to a maximum of 12.0 mL/h and a minimum of 1 mL/h. The specific variable-rate feedback infusion mode setting was based on previous research, and the opinions of manufacturers and researchers to ensure patient safety and to provide effective analgesia.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shenzhen University General Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities

    collaborator OTHER
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-30
Primary Completion
2027-10-30
Completion
2027-12-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07361822 on ClinicalTrials.gov