MedTrace Logo

Inter-semispinal Fascial Plane Block (ISPB) Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

NCT07340801 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 102

Last updated 2026-05-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Recent advances in regional anesthesia techniques have aimed to provide more targeted and effective pain relief. Among these, the erector spinae plane (ESPB) block, the multifidus cervicis plane (MCP) block, and the paraspinal interfascial plane block (PIP) is rapidly expanding in cervical spine surgery. Of these, the inter-semispinal fascial plane block (ISPB) has gained popularity as an analgesic technique for posterior cervical spine surgery also, (ESPB) have been tried successfully for posterior cervical spine surgery in few recent trials. But to our knowledge, no study compared the efficacy of both blocks. So, the current study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of inter-semispinal fascial plane block versus erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery.

Conditions

  • Analgesia

Interventions

DRUG

Bupivacaine

injection of 15 mL Bupivacaine 0.25% on each side

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fayoum University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mahdy Abdelhady, MD · Fayoum University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-11-01
Primary Completion
2026-02-28
Completion
2026-03-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07340801 on ClinicalTrials.gov