Effect of Antiseptic Irrigations With 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (Irrisept) Versus Normal Saline on Fasciocutaneous Flap-Based Closure of Pilonidal Disease
NCT07321704 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2026-03-27
Summary
Pilonidal disease is a chronic condition that causes painful inflammation and infection near the top of the buttocks. Many patients require surgery, and one commonly used approach is a bilateral gluteal fasciocutaneous flap with midline closure along with placement of an extracellular matrix to support wound healing. Although effective, this surgery can still lead to wound problems such as infection, fluid collection (seroma), wound separation (dehiscence), and delayed healing.
This study aims to compare two different solutions used to rinse the surgical wound before closing it. One solution is Irrisept, which contains 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, an antiseptic designed to reduce bacteria. The other is normal saline, which is the current standard rinse used in surgery. The goal is to determine whether using Irrisept can safely reduce post-operative infections and wound-related complications in patients undergoing flap closure and extracellular matrix implantation for pilonidal disease.
Conditions
- Pilonidal Disease
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Irrisept (0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate)
Irrisept solution will be used to irrigate the surgical wound prior to flap closure. The solution is applied using manufacturer-recommended technique and volume. No other changes to surgical care are made.
- OTHER
-
Normal Saline
Sterile normal saline will be used to irrigate the surgical wound prior to flap closure according to the surgeon's standard technique. No antiseptic agents will be added.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Irrimax Corporation
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Yosef Nasseri, MD
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-17
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-01
- Completion
- 2027-12-01
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Two Different Flap Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT05851690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GLUtEus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT03914729 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Closure vs Open Technique for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT07311707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Operative vs Non Operative Treatment for Pilonidal Disease
NCT05439291 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Phenol or Laser: Best Minimally Invasive Treatment for Pilonidal Sinus?
NCT06721169 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Non-Powered Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Open Technique for Pilonidal Disease
NCT03483480 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect Of Wound Irrigation With Irrisept™ Delivery System On Abscess Healing In Patients Presenting To The Emergency Department
NCT01302548 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Hardware Wound Healing In Surgical Treatment Of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT01876537 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Treatment Methods for Pilonidal Disease
NCT03070028 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pilonidal Disease Wound Healing Study
NCT01857128 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bathing Bundle Regimen in Reducing Gynecological Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Surgery
NCT01597804 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Irrisept Versus Standard of Care in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections
NCT02255487 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
De-roofing and Curettage vs WLE for Pilonidal Abscess
NCT03415347 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Rhomboid Flap vs. Deep Suturing in Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus
NCT06152952 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Laser Hair Removal for Treatment of Pilonidal Disease
NCT03949140 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clipping Versus No Hair Removal and the Risk of Surgical Site Infections
NCT00975377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Excision and Reconstruction of the Natal Cleft With a Parasacral Perforator Flap Versus Open Excision With Secondary Healing, in the Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease.
NCT03534700 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Crystallized Phenol Treatment in Pilonidal Sinus
NCT04681443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Open Wide Excision Versus Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease
NCT01241136 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Laser Hair Removal in Pilonidal Disease
NCT03276065 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial in Mini-invasive Pilonidal Sinus Disease Surgery
NCT06964763 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures Impact on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopic Surgeries.
NCT04255927 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Outcomes of Keystone Perforator Island Flap Versus Lay Open in Re-recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT06741449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Needle-Aspirated Compression Dressing Following Ostomy Reversal
NCT03703661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Promising Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Infected Pilonidal Sinus
NCT05900518 ·Status: COMPLETED