Charcoal Toothbrushes and Bacterial Contamination: a Clinical Trial.

NCT07275684 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2025-12-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the antibacterial effectiveness of toothbrushes with charcoal-impregnated bristles compared to conventional toothbrushes without charcoal. The main objective is to assess and compare the microbial contamination on the toothbrushes after 21 days of use.

Thirty-two healthy dental students from the Faculty of Dental Medicine of Rabat (16 males and 16 females, aged 18-24) were enrolled through convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups:

Group A: Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrushes with charcoal-impregnated bristles.

Group B: Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrushes without charcoal (control group).

Participants brushed their teeth twice daily for two minutes using the rolling technique and a standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm). They were instructed not to use mouthwash or antiseptic toothpaste, to rinse brushes only with tap water (without touching the bristles), to store them vertically with bristles facing upward, and to keep them uncovered and at least one meter away from toilets.

After 21 days, used toothbrushes were collected in sterile pouches and transferred to the microbiology laboratory. A quarter of the bristles from each brush head was aseptically cut, immersed in sterile saline solution, and vortexed to dislodge microorganisms. Aliquots of 200 µL were inoculated onto blood agar (Columbia agar base enriched with sterile blood). After incubation at 37°C for 48 hours, colony-forming units (CFU) were manually counted to estimate microbial contamination levels (CFU/mL).

Clinical data (Silness and Löe plaque index, Löe and Silness gingival index, and DMF index) were collected at baseline.

Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi software. The comparison of CFU counts between groups aimed to determine whether charcoal impregnation reduces microbial contamination of toothbrush bristles.

This study involves minimal risk and no investigational drug or device. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dental Medicine of Rabat.

Conditions

  • Oral Hygiene
  • Toothbrush Contamination
  • Bacterial Contamination

Interventions

DEVICE

Charcoal-Impregnated Toothbrush

Participants use the Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrush with charcoal bristles as described in Arm 1. Daily brushing is twice for 2 minutes, using the rolling technique, with standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm). Proper storage instructions and daily log recording are followed.

DEVICE

Conventional Toothbrush

Participants use the Colgate Double Action Medium toothbrush without charcoal bristles as described in Arm 2. Daily brushing is twice for 2 minutes, using the rolling technique, with standardized fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm). Proper storage instructions and daily log recording are followed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Oral Biotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Mohammed V University in Rabat

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Mohammed V University in Rabat

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
24 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-04-16
Primary Completion
2025-05-30
Completion
2025-06-11

Countries

  • Morocco

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07275684 on ClinicalTrials.gov