Interrupted vs Subcuticular Sutures With Drain in Open Appendectomy

NCT07274878 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2025-12-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary aim of this study is to compare wound outcomes between two closure strategies after open appendectomy:

1. Simple interrupted skin sutures (standard method), versus
2. Subcuticular (intradermal) skin suture combined with a subcutaneous closed suction drain.

Specifically, the study aims to

* Determine whether the combined subcuticular closure with drain reduces the incidence of superficial surgical- site infection (SSI) within 30 days compared with interrupted sutures.
* Evaluate the effect of both techniques on secondary outcomes, including seroma or abscess formation, wound dehiscence, post-operative pain, cosmetic appearance of the scar, length of hospital stay, and drain-related adverse events.

Conditions

  • Sutures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

subcuticular suture plus subcutaneous drain

Subcuticular suture plus subcutaneous drain uses a continuous absorbable subcuticular stitch combined with a drain placed in the subcutaneous layer to reduce dead space and fluid collection-offering both cosmetic closure and added infection-prevention compared with standard skin-only techniques.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-01
Primary Completion
2026-12-01
Completion
2027-01-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07274878 on ClinicalTrials.gov