Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT07263737 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46
Last updated 2026-02-18
Summary
This randomized controlled study evaluated whether adding pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy to conventional physical therapy provides additional benefits for neuropathic pain and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
→ This study randomly assigned patients into groups to compare treatments. It examined whether adding pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy to standard physical therapy could give extra improvement in nerve-related pain and daily function in people with a slipped disc in the lower back.
Fifty-two patients with ≥3 months of radicular and neuropathic symptoms were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (PEMF + conventional therapy) or a control group (sham PEMF + conventional therapy).
→ Fifty-two patients who had leg pain and nerve-related symptoms for at least three months joined the study. They were randomly placed into either a treatment group (which received PEMF plus regular therapy) or a control group (which received a fake PEMF treatment plus regular therapy).
Both groups received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, hot packs, and a lumbar exercise program for 15 sessions.
→ Both groups also received the same standard treatments: electrical nerve stimulation, hot packs, and a lower-back exercise program for 15 sessions.
Clinical outcomes-including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold, Modified Schober test, DN4, PainDetect, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36-were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and one month after treatment.
→ Several health measures were checked before treatment, right after treatment, and again one month later. These included pain level (VAS), how sensitive the area was to pressure, lower-back flexibility, nerve-pain questionnaires (DN4 and PainDetect), disability level (ODI), and overall quality of life (SF-36).
Forty-six patients completed the study. → A total of 46 patients finished the study.
Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS scores, neuropathic pain questionnaires (DN4, PainDetect), ODI, and several SF-36 subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, and pain), with additional improvements in emotional role and social functioning observed only in the PEMF group.
→ Both groups improved in many areas: pain levels, nerve-pain scores, disability, and some parts of quality of life (such as physical functioning, daily roles, and pain). Only the PEMF group showed extra improvement in emotional well-being and social activities.
However, none of the between-group comparisons demonstrated significant differences.
* However, when the two groups were compared to each other, there were no meaningful differences.
No meaningful changes were found in lumbar flexibility or pressure pain thresholds in either group.
→ Neither group showed important changes in lower-back flexibility or in how much pressure they could tolerate on painful areas.
In conclusion, adding PEMF therapy to conventional physical therapy did not provide additional benefit for neuropathic symptoms, radicular pain, disability, lumbar flexibility, pressure pain threshold, or quality of life in patients with LDH-related neuropathic pain.
→ In summary, adding PEMF therapy to regular physical therapy did not give extra benefits for nerve pain, leg pain, disability, back flexibility, sensitivity to pressure, or quality of life in people with nerve-related pain caused by a slipped disc.
Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF)
In our study, the device used for PEMA application was the BTL-4000 Smart. The PEMA waves applied to the treatment group were elongated square-wave signals with a frequency of 55.55 Hz and a magnetic flux density of 30 mT. A 60-cm solenoid applicator of the device was used. With this applicator, a 30-minute treatment was delivered to cover the lumbar region.
- DEVICE
-
Sham PEMF
Sham application with the same device
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-10-30
- Primary Completion
- 2023-07-15
- Completion
- 2023-08-15
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Diamagnetic Therapy in Pain and Inflammation
NCT06844552 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Efficacy of Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT05057871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve
NCT06187883 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Management of Post-operative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
NCT01383122 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postoperative Knee Pain
NCT01415856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Stimulation on DOMS
NCT05554874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Lumbar Facet-Related Pain
NCT06157294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Radiofrequency of 448 kHz on Pain and Function
NCT05682287 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for TMJ Dysfunction After Facial Penetrating Injury
NCT04561037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of PEMF (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field) Therapy in the Treatment of Persistent Post-Operative Pain Following Lumbar Surgery
NCT02416973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assess the Effectiveness of Pulse RadioFrequency in Patients With Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain
NCT01117870 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study on Magnetic Field Therapy to Improve Quality of Sleep and Reduction of Chronic Spine Pain
NCT00445133 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Impact of Dry Needling on Electrophysiological and Ultrasound-based Biomarkers for Myofascial Pain
NCT07270276 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study on Magnetic Field Therapy to Improve Chronic Lumbar Pain
NCT00444990 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Blue Light Device for Pain Therapy
NCT01528332 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
High Frequency Impulse Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in NMOSD
NCT04614454 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of Shock-wave Therapy in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT04814017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Fibromyalgia
NCT02704611 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RF/PEMF Versus Ultrasound for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Injury
NCT03774823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double-Blind Placebo Study on Magnetic Field Therapy in Chronic Lumbar Pain
NCT00407615 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Non-Invasive Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
NCT06185816 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Effects of MR With TENS Conductive Glove in Adults With Neck Myofascial Syndrome.
NCT05367752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vibration and Dry Needle in Trigger Point Therapy
NCT04900857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Magnets in the Treatment of Sciatica
NCT00044109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Efficacy of Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Compare to Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT05320601 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA