The Effect of Apical Patency on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment

Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate whether implementing apical patency affects the intensity of postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatment in asymptomatic, vital, single-rooted teeth.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does maintaining apical patency by gently extending a #10 K-file 1 mm beyond the working length during canal shaping influence postoperative pain compared with instrumentation confined within the working length?

In the patency group, the working length was determined with an electronic apex locator and radiograph, and then apical patency was maintained by passively extending a #10 K-file 1 mm beyond the working length at each instrument change to prevent apical blockage, remove debris, and facilitate irrigant delivery to the apical terminus.

In the non-patency group, the working length was likewise established with an electronic apex locator and radiograph, but all subsequent instrumentation was confined within the working length and no file was advanced beyond the apical foramen.

In both groups, all other clinical procedures-including anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation, rotary canal shaping with the One Curve NiTi system, standardized irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, obturation with gutta-percha and epoxy resin-based sealer, and definitive composite restoration-were performed in a single visit using the same protocol. Postoperative pain was recorded on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 0-6, 6-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 hours, and analgesic intake within 48 hours was documented.

Conditions

• Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Root canal treatment with apical patency

Single-visit root canal treatment of asymptomatic vital single-rooted teeth in which apical patency is maintained. After working length determination with an electronic apex locator and radiographic confirmation, a #10 K-file is gently extended 1 mm beyond the working length at each instrument change to prevent apical blockage, remove debris, and facilitate irrigant delivery to the apical terminus. All other steps, including anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation, rotary shaping with the One Curve NiTi system, standardized irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, obturation, and definitive composite restoration, follow a standardized protocol.

PROCEDURE

Root canal treatment without apical patency

Single-visit root canal treatment of asymptomatic vital single-rooted teeth in which apical patency is not maintained. After working length determination with an electronic apex locator and radiographic confirmation, all subsequent instrumentation is confined within the working length and no file is advanced beyond the apical foramen. All other steps, including anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation, rotary shaping with the One Curve NiTi system, standardized irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, obturation, and definitive composite restoration, follow the same standardized protocol as in the patency group.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cukurova University

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Adile Şehnaz Yılmaz, DDS, Phd, Professor · Cukurova University

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Masking

DOUBLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Max Age

65 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2024-10-05

Primary Completion

2024-12-14

Completion

2025-02-10

Countries

• Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations