MedTrace Logo

Evaluating the Impact of Small Versus Large Urethral Stiches (or 'Bites') on Urinary Continence.

NCT07226687 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2026-02-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To evaluate the impact of sustainable functional urethral reconstruction (SFUR) on early recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Conditions

  • Prostatectomy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Small Urethral Bite Technique

The small urethral bite technique involves placing sutures (stitches) that are \~5-7 mm from the edge of the urethra. Each suture penetrates the full thickness of the urethra.

PROCEDURE

Large Urethral Bite Technique

The large urethral bite technique involves placing sutures (stitches) that are \~15-20 mm from the edge of the urethra. Each suture penetrates the full thickness of the urethra.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Chicago

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Scott Eggener · University of Chicago

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-09-30
Primary Completion
2031-05-23
Completion
2031-05-23

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07226687 on ClinicalTrials.gov