ArticuGrasp Trial: New Flexible Tool vs Standard Grasper for Lung Cancer Node Removal in Keyhole Chest Surgery
NCT07201077 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2025-10-01
Summary
This study is testing whether a new, flexible surgical tool-the SurgeoFlex Grasp-makes keyhole chest operations for early-stage lung cancer easier, faster, and safer than the standard rigid tool used today.
What is the problem? In keyhole (uniportal) chest surgery, formally known as single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), surgeons reach the lung through one small incision between the ribs. Because the operating space is tight, the usual stiff instruments can bump into each other and into surrounding tissues. This difficulty can prolong lymph-node removal and increase the risk of complications.
What is being tested?
The trial compares two handheld tools:
SurgeoFlex Grasp (intervention): a slim, bendable grasper that can be steered around corners.
Traditional EndoGrasper (control): a straight, rigid grasper currently used as the standard.
Who is taking part? Approximately 100 adults with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (tumours 3 cm or smaller) who are scheduled for keyhole surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.
What will happen?
Participants are allocated by randomisation into one of two groups:
SurgeoFlex group-surgeons use the new flexible tool. Control group-surgeons use the standard rigid tool. All other aspects of the operation, anaesthesia, and post-operative care remain identical for both groups.
What is measured? Lymphadenectomy time (duration required to remove the specified lymph nodes). Number of lymph nodes successfully removed. Frequency of surgical-instrument collisions or interference (instrument-clash events).
Surgeon workload during the operation (assessed with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index \[NASA-TLX\]).
Skin-incision length, pain scores (Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\]), recovery time, infection rates, and overall cost.
Quality-of-life scores one month after surgery (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 \[EORTC QLQ-C30\] and its lung-cancer module \[EORTC QLQ-LC13\]).
What is expected? The investigators expect the SurgeoFlex Grasp to shorten operative time, reduce instrument interference, lower surgeon stress, and accelerate recovery without increasing cost.
How will this help patients? If the new tool performs as anticipated, future patients undergoing keyhole lung-cancer surgery may experience shorter operations, smaller scars, less pain, and lower infection risk while still obtaining complete cancer-related lymph-node removal.
Where is the study taking place? The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Contact for more information:
Clinical Research Management Committee 151 Yanjiang Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, China Email: [email protected]
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Articulating lymph-node grasper (SurgeoFlex Grasp)
Arm 1 - SurgeoFlex Grasp A single-use, low-profile articulating grasper with a 5-millimetre (mm) shaft and a 360-degree (360°) steerable distal tip. During uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS), the device is introduced through the same 3-4-centimetre (cm) utility incision used for the camera and stapler. The flexible neck allows the jaws to approach hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes from multiple angles without repositioning the instrument shaft, thereby reducing instrument collision and chest-wall torque.
- DEVICE
-
Arm 2 Intervention Name Traditional rigid endograsper
Arm 2 - Traditional Rigid EndoGrasper A reusable, straight-shafted 5 mm grasper with fixed-angle jaws identical to those used in conventional multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The instrument is passed through the single 3-4 cm incision in the same fashion as the SurgeoFlex Grasp, but its rigid shaft limits the working angle and often requires external repositioning of the entire instrument to reach deep lymph-node stations.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Jianxing He
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-03-31
- Completion
- 2025-03-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Endobronchial Ultrasound vs Mediastinoscopy in NSCLC
NCT00372203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Image - Navigated Resection of Lung Nodules
NCT04702165 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy-Assisted Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
NCT07040670 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Navigational Bronchoscopic and CT-Guided Preoperative Markings in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery
NCT06957600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive, Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer
NCT01011595 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Cryoablation in the Treatment of Ground-Glass Nodules
NCT07232433 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Staging With the Use of Intraoperative Ultrasound
NCT02218242 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Avecure Flexible Microwave Ablation Probe For Lung Nodules
NCT05281237 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Predicting the Integrity of Interlobar Fissures Based on Chest Image AI Technology
NCT05774730 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Optimization of the Sensitivity of Histological Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules
NCT05230992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endobronchial Ultrasound- Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Versus Mediastinoscopy for Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
NCT01079520 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endobronchial Ultrasound Versus Mediastinoscopy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
NCT00559611 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Benefit of Cone-beam CT and Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy During Bronchoscopy
NCT06489678 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Real-World Case Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RBS Cryobiopsy
NCT06832930 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer With EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA
NCT00741247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Performance of Robotic, Electromagnetic Navigation and Fluoroscopy Drives Optimal Diagnostic Strategy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions
NCT06701448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Three-Dimensionally Printed Navigational Template in Lung Biopsy
NCT04775901 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy and Safety of TBCB vs TBFB in Diagnosis of GGO
NCT04727190 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate the Diagnostic Value of Puncture Biopsy for PPL Under the Guidance of Navigation and Radial EBUS: a Real-World Study
NCT04692038 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Transbronchial, Cryoprobe, and VATS Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease
NCT02075762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Cryobiopsy of Mediastinal/Hilar Lymph Nodes
NCT06921681 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Technique for Localization of Pulmonary Nodules Using Spy Thoracoscope System
NCT02090660 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Comparison of Uniportal and Tubeless Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease
NCT03958162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of a Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Ultrasound for Localization of Pulmonary Nodules
NCT02665078 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Novel Thin Bronchoscope Versus Ultrathin Bronchoscope for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
NCT07135297 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA