Comparative Performance of Robotic, Electromagnetic Navigation and Fluoroscopy Drives Optimal Diagnostic Strategy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

NCT06701448 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 342

Last updated 2024-11-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Currently, the optimal method for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (PPL) is uncertain. We aim to compare the diagnostic yield of Robotic Bronchoscopy System (RBS), Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy (ENB), Fluoroscope-Bronchoscopy (FB).

Conditions

  • Pulmonary Nodule
  • Bronchoscopy

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

robotic bronchosopy

robotic bronchoscopy

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy

Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Fluoroscopy bronchoscopy

Fluoroscopy bronchoscopy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Guangzhou Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-04-01
Primary Completion
2023-12-31
Completion
2023-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06701448 on ClinicalTrials.gov