Comparison of Surgical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss by Suction Curettage Versus Hysteroscopy in Patients Undergoing In-vitro Fertilization (IVF)

NCT07143578 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2026-01-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Early pregnancy loss occurs in \~15% of pregnancies. The treatment options include surgical uterine evacuation by suction curettage, medical management with misoprostol, or conservative management without interventions. The advantages of surgical management include quick resolution of the pregnancy and avoidance of heavy vaginal bleeding, while the disadvantages include retained products of conception and intrauterine adhesion formation which could affect future fertility. With the aim of reducing the complications of suction curettage, uterine evacuation using operative hysteroscopy has been suggested.

In a previous study, the investigators compared suction curettage with operative hysteroscopy for the surgical management of early pregnancy loss up to 10 weeks of gestation. The results showed significantly reduced adhesions rate (4.2% in the hysteroscopy group vs. 45.2% in the suction group, p \< 0.01), although the operative time was significantly longer for the hysteroscopy.

In this follow-up study, the investigators will compare the outcomes of hysteroscopy and suction curettage in a select group of patients with early pregnancy loss following conception by in-vitro fertilization. These patients are at risk for adhesions and therefore candidates for the hysteroscopic intervention. The study will include 50 patients randomized to 2 intervention arms - hysteroscopy using a tissue removal device versus the standard suction curettage. Post-operative adhesions will be assessed by office hysteroscopy after 6-8 weeks.

Conditions

  • Early Abortion
  • Pregnancy Loss, Early

Interventions

DEVICE

Operative hysteroscopy using tissue removal device

Operative hysteroscopy using tissue removal device

DEVICE

suction curettage

suction curettage using plastic scution curette

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Noam Smorgick, MD · Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

  • Maya Naor Dovev, MD · Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-08-20
Primary Completion
2026-08-30
Completion
2027-08-30

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07143578 on ClinicalTrials.gov