MedTrace Logo

Dilation and Curettage Versus Operative Hysteroscopy for Missed Abortion

NCT04705324 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 55

Last updated 2023-03-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Randomizedtrial comparing success and complication rates of operative hysteroscopy versus traditional dilation and curettage (D\&C) in the management of first trimester missed abortion.

Conditions

  • Spontaneous Abortion
  • Missed Abortion
  • Intrauterine Adhesion
  • Retained Products of Conception

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Operative Hysteroscopy

Separation of the non-viable gestational sac from the uterine wall will through operative hysteroscopy

PROCEDURE

D&C

Separation of the non-viable gestational sac from the uterine wall through dilation and curettage

PROCEDURE

Operative Hysteroscopy - safety and feasibility

Operative hysteroscopy - safety and feasibility phase

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Yariv Yogev, M.D. · Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-01-21
Primary Completion
2024-01-20
Completion
2024-01-20

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04705324 on ClinicalTrials.gov