Norethindrone Impact on Receptiva Outcomes
NCT07134920 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 99
Last updated 2026-04-15
Summary
This retrospective study aims to evaluate pregnancy outcomes in patients with a positive BCL6 test (ReceptivaDx, who were treated with either norethindrone acetate or Depo Lupron prior to embryo transfer. The current standard of care involves treatment with Depo Lupron, a GnRH agonist associated with significant hypoestrogenic side effects that mimic menopausal symptoms. Additionally, Depo Lupron is costly, with a retail price exceeding $2,000 per dose. In contrast, norethindrone acetate is a well-tolerated oral progestin, available at a fraction of the cost (under $100 for a one-month course). While prior studies have demonstrated comparable efficacy between Depo Lupron and norethindrone for managing endometriosis-associated pain, their relative effectiveness in improving reproductive outcomes-particularly in BCL6-positive patients undergoing embryo transfer-remains underexplored. This study seeks to address that gap by comparing ongoing pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates between the two treatment groups.
Hypothesis: IVF Patients testing positive for BCL6 and treated with norethindrone will not do worse than the current recommended treatment of 60 days Depo leuprolide as defined by two endpoint metrics, pregnancy rate and live birth rate.
Conditions
- Infertility (IVF Patients)
- Infertility Female
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cicero Diagnostic
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Inception Fertility Research Institute, LLC
lead INDUSTRY
Eligibility
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-12
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-19
- Completion
- 2025-12-19
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dosage Strengths of Pulsatile GnRH Delivered From a Iontophoretic Patch Compared to Oral Treatment With Clomiphene or Placebo in Infertile Females
NCT00796289 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT04537078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Oral Contraceptive Pill and GnRH Antagonist Versus Long Protocol in IVF Patients
NCT01157754 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Live Birth Rates After Following Long Antagonist Protocol Versus Classical Antagonist Protocol
NCT03684421 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation
NCT06212102 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Luteal Phase-start Ovarian Stimulation With Corifollitropin Alfa
NCT03555942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GnRH Antagonist to Prepare Recipients for Embryo Transfer
NCT00460642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist During 3 Days
NCT01093443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Prospective Randomized Multicentre Study to Compare Crinone 8% Once Daily Versus Other Vaginal Progesterone.
NCT00708539 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Low Dose GnRHa Early Luteal Phase Down Regulation Versus GnRHa Ultra-short Protocol for Poor Ovarian Response
NCT02940535 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
There is a Value of Luteinizing Hormone Predictive of in Vitro Fertilization Treatment Outcome in Antagonist Protocols?
NCT02328924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.
NCT04108039 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Administration of GnRH Antagonist to Oocyte Donation Recipients
NCT00635258 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Live Birth Rates After Following Long Antagonist Protocol Versus Long Agonist Protocol
NCT03693534 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Dydrogesterone, Cetrorelix Acetate and Triptorelin in Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes
NCT05972902 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Optimizing Ovulation Induction in the Poor Responder
NCT01200537 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Progevera 10 mg® Versus Orgalutran® in Ovarian Stimulation Cycles of Oocyte Donors
NCT02796105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Flexible GnRH Antagonist vs Flare up GnRH Agonist Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT00417066 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral Dydrogesterone 30 mg Daily Versus Crinone 8% Intravaginal Progesterone Gel 90 mg Daily for Luteal Support in In-Vitro Fertilization (LOTUS II)
NCT02491437 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Use of Antagonist Versus Agonist GnRH in Oocyte Recipient Endometrium Preparation
NCT00633347 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Oestradiol Pre-treatment in an Ultrashort Flare GnRH Agonist/GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Undergoing IVF
NCT01798836 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Efficacy and Safety of Medication Used to Stimulate Ovulation
NCT02715336 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Difference Between Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol and Antagonist Protocol
NCT06738602 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Luteal Phase Support With GnRH Agonist After GnRH Agonist Triggering in IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT06150703 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Comparison of the Microdose Leuprolide Protocol vs. Luteal Phase Ganirelix Protocol in Women Who Are or Who Are Predicted to be Low Responders
NCT00633555 ·Status: COMPLETED