Progestin Primed Double Stimulation Protocol Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders
NCT04537078 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2022-02-17
Summary
The worldwide prevalence of primary and secondary infertility is estimated at \~2% and 10.5%, respectively, among women aged 20-44 years and attempting to conceive. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) involve 9-24% of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). proper tailoring of the ovarian stimulation protocol in order to maximize the number of oocytes collected represents a crucial step for them to eventually conceive.
Recent evidence indicates that in the same menstrual cycle, there are multiple follicular recruitment waves. This coincides with the theory that folliculogenesis occurs in a wave-like fashion. Thus, within a single menstrual cycle, there can theoretically be multiple opportunities for a clinician to collect oocytes, as opposed to the conventional single cohort of antral follicles during the follicular phase.
Utilizing this concept, clinicians have been attempting to retrieve oocytes from poor responders using both the follicular-phase stimulation (FPS) and the luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) protocols to increase the number of oocytes collected shorter within shorter period of time. By increasing the number of the retrieved oocytes collected, a better clinical can be assured since there is a clear relationship between the number of oocytes collected and live birth rates across all female age groups.
which protocol is the most effective remains controversial and the efficacy of PPOS in POR compared with that of conventional protocols is unclear.
Conditions
- Infertility, Female
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Duphaston
will be used for pituitary suppression in the first arm:20 mg/day will be started from the first day of the ovulation induction in the follicular phase and in the luteal phase will be started the next day after oocyte pickup at 20 mg/day.
- DRUG
-
Gonadotropin
will be used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in both arms
- DRUG
-
Cetrotide Injectable Product
will used in the second arm for pituitary suppression in the second group daily when the biggest oocyte reaches size 14 mm till ovulation triggering
- DRUG
-
Decapeptyl
will be used for ovulation triggering.in the first arm:in a dose of 2 ampules of 0.2 mg will be administered when leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter. in the second arm:in a dose of 2 ampules 0.2 mg will be administered when leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter in the first cycle only.
- DRUG
-
Chorionic Gonadotropin
will be used in the second cycle of the second arm for ovulation triggering in a dose of 10,000 IU when the leading follicle \>18 mm in diameter.
- DRUG
-
Combined Oral Contraceptive
luteal phase priming from day 21 of the cycle before controlled ovarian stimulation for one week .
- DRUG
-
Cyclo-Progynova
Starting from cycle Day 3 of the intented cycle for thawed embryo transfer, patients will receive the white tablets of Cyclo-Progynova daily. From Day 10 onwards, endometrium growth will be monitored by transvaginal ultrasound.
- DRUG
-
progesterone
in the intended cycle of embryo transfer when endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm. Progesterone administration (as 800 mg/day vaginal suppositories per day and 100 mg ampule IM every other day) will be continued until pregnancy testing 18 days after embryo transfer and in pregnant cases will continued till the 12 weeks of gestation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
El Shatby University Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Aly A Hussein, Ass.lecturer · Elshatby University hospital
-
Sherif S Gaafar, Professor · Elshatby University hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-03-01
- Completion
- 2021-09-01
- FDA Drug
- Yes
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of the Live Birth Rate Between the PPOS and the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients Undergoing IVF
NCT03680053 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Dydrogesterone-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Versus Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in ICSI
NCT05751681 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Trigger Versus GnRHa Trigger Combined With Luteal HCG Administration
NCT02330770 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Pregnancy Outcomes With a GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH-Agonist Protocol in ICSI Cycles
NCT00485537 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Acting FSH Plus Antagonist Versus Daily FSH Plus Antagonist Versus Short Agonist Protocol in Poor Responders Undergoing IVF
NCT02070198 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of GnRH Agonist vs GnRH Antagonist on Oocyte Morphology in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients During IVF/ICSI
NCT04727684 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact of Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone Analogues on Oocyte and Embryo Quality
NCT03139474 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Dydrogesterone, Cetrorelix Acetate and Triptorelin in Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes
NCT05972902 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Low Dose GnRHa Early Luteal Phase Down Regulation Versus GnRHa Ultra-short Protocol for Poor Ovarian Response
NCT02940535 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dydrogesterone Versus GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing Double Ovarian Stimulation
NCT06212102 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Impact of Body Weight on Reproductive Outcomes in Poor Ovarian Responders in ICSI Cycles
NCT03457233 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Antagonist Versus Agonist GnRH in Oocyte Recipient Endometrium Preparation
NCT00633347 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist on Triggering Day: A Randomized Controlled Study
NCT00571870 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Cetrotide® 3 Milligram (mg) Versus Antagon™ in Women Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation
NCT00298025 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of GnRH Agonist vs GnRH Antagonist on Oocyte Morphology During IVF/ICSI
NCT04724486 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Progesterone Primed Protocol Versus GnRH Antagonist in With PCO Undergoing ICSI
NCT05951400 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Live Birth Rate Between PPOS and GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Anticipated High Ovarian Response
NCT04414761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Omitting GnRH-antagonist Dose on the Day of Ovulation Trigger
NCT03044756 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Effect of GnRH Agonist vs GnRH Antagonist on IVF/ICSI Outcomes in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients.
NCT04727671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of GnRH Agonist vs GnRH Antagonist on IVF/ICSI Outcomes.
NCT04724343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Response to Low Dose Clomiphene Citrate in Normally Menstruating Fertile Women
NCT01340521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparing Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproduction With Two Different Forms of Pituitary Suppression
NCT01565265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prediction of Metaphase II Oocytes According to Different Levels of Serum AMH in Poor Responders Using the Antagonist Protocol
NCT03484611 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Letrozole Regimen Co-treatment With Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Undergoing IVF-ET
NCT04268927 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
COMPARING TWO PROTOCOLS FOR FINAL OOCYTE MATURATION IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING GnRH-ANTAGONIST ICSI CYCLES
NCT05397795 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3