Efficacy of Bioactive Glass vs. Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

NCT07125846 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2025-08-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and histologic efficacy of using bioactive glass bone graft (UNIGRAFT by Biomed Inc., USA) compared to a conventional xenograft in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. A total of 20 patients classified as SA4 according to the Misch classification will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Outcomes will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for vertical bone gain and, where applicable, histologic analysis. The study is conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University.

Conditions

  • Alveolar Bone Loss
  • Maxillary Sinus Disease
  • Tooth Loss

Interventions

DEVICE

Bioactive Glass Bone Graft (UNIGRAFT)

A bioactive glass bone graft material (UNIGRAFT, Biomed Inc., USA) used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation via open sinus lift technique.

DEVICE

Xenograft Bone Graft (Bio-Oss)

A commercially available bovine-derived xenograft material (Bio-Oss, Geistlich Pharma) used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation via open sinus lift technique.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Suez Canal University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohamed A Elsholkamy, Professor · Suez Canal University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-10-15
Primary Completion
2026-02-01
Completion
2026-04-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07125846 on ClinicalTrials.gov