The Effectiveness of Different Therapeutic Jaw Position Determining Methods in Repositioning Splint Therapy for Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacement Without Reduction：A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if different therapeutic jaw position determining methods influence the efficacy of repositioning splint therapy for temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does different therapeutic jaw position determining methods influence the efficacy of repositioning splint therapy for temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction? Researchers will compare the efficacy of repositioning splint therapy made with different therapeutic jaw position determining methods for temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction.

Participants will:

Take repositioning splint made with different therapeutic jaw position determining methods every day for 3-6 months.

Visit the clinic once every 3 weeks for checkups and tests.

Conditions

• Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Repositioning splint therapy with jaw position determined by mechanical articulator

The therapeutic jaw position will be determined by the following steps: 1. Pre-treatment Jaw Position Recording Participants were seated upright with relaxed posture, eyes facing forward, and the Frankfort plane parallel to the floor. Intercuspal position (ICP) was recorded using silicone registration material. Edge-to-edge position of central incisors was recorded for protrusive position. Left/right lateral positions were recorded with opposing canines aligned. 2. Transfer of Jaw Positions Following the manufacturer's protocol for the Artex CR mechanical facebow (Amann Girrbach, Austria) to transfer Participants' jaw positions. 3. Determination of Therapeutic Position The Glenoid fossa was divided into 7 grids in the oblique-sagittal plane using Gelb's method, identifying grid 4 (Gelb 4/7) as the target condylar position.Condylar displacement knobs were set per VTO analysis. Incisal pin height was increased to establish vertical dimension.

PROCEDURE

Repositioning splint therapy with jaw position determined by ai-assisted virtual articulator

The jaw position was determined by the following steps: 1. AI-Based Segmentation and Reconstruction of Jaw Models CBCT DICOM data was imported into an ai-based craniomaxillofacial bone segmentation system to reconstruct 3D models of the jaws and dentition. The mandibular/maxillary bone models and dental arches were exported as .ply files. These .ply files were then imported into Exocad software. 2. Virtual Transfer of Jaw Positions Bilateral AI-segmented medial pole points of the condyles and the right infraorbital point were annotated in cross-sectional views.A virtual articulator was added and registered to the facebow's reference planes and hinge axis. (3)Determination of Therapeutic Position Sagittal joint spaces (anterior/superior/posterior) were measured on cross-sectional views. The composite mandibular model was repositioned to the target occlusion using the "Move Mesh" function based on: Optimal mean joint space measurements and physiological condylar position.

PROCEDURE

Repositioning splint therapy with jaw position determined by ai-assisted virtual patient

The jaw position was determined by the following steps: 1. AI-Based Segmentation and Reconstruction of Virtual Patients: CBCT DICOM data was imported into an ai-based craniomaxillofacial bone segmentation system to reconstruct 3D models of the jaws and dentition. The trajectory of mandibular movement was recorded by an electronic facebow. 2. Virtual Transfer of Jaw Positions Bilateral AI-segmented medial pole points of the condyles and the right infraorbital point were annotated in cross-sectional views.A virtual articulator was added and registered to the facebow's reference planes and hinge axis. (3)Determination of Therapeutic Position Sagittal joint spaces (anterior/superior/posterior) were measured on cross-sectional views. The therapeutic position was determined based on: Optimal mean joint space measurements, physiological condylar position and optimal trajectory of mandibular movement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Fujian Medical University

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Hao Yu, PhD, MD · Fujian Medical University, China

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

13 Years

Max Age

50 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2025-07-20

Primary Completion

2026-08-20

Completion

2026-08-20

Countries

• China

Study Locations