MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Wound Healing in Fistulectomy and Fistulectomy With Marsupialization

NCT07080424 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 340

Last updated 2025-07-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study was done at Central Park Medical College Lahore during January to September, 2024. Low fistula-in-ano patients were randomized into 2 groups i.e. Group A (SUR 1 fistulectomy) and Group B (170 patients in each group). The same surgical team applied all their procedures to reach spinal anesthesia. Wound infection determined after the operation was done clinically and verified by culture at 10 days of follow up. Statistical analyses based on SPSS version 26 were carried out and p \< 0.05 terminated as significant.

Conditions

  • Wound Healing
  • Fistulectomy
  • Fistulectomy With Marsupialization
  • Fistula in Ano

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Fistulectomy with Marsupialization

Patients with fistula in ano treated with Fistulectomy with Marsupialization and were compared for wound healing with other group

PROCEDURE

Fistulectomy

Patients with fistula in ano treated with Fistulectomy and were compared for wound healing with other group

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Central Park Medical College

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-01-01
Primary Completion
2024-09-01
Completion
2024-10-01

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07080424 on ClinicalTrials.gov