MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Conventional Versus Transverse Mini-Incision Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release

NCT07018011 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46

Last updated 2025-06-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aimed at to fill the gaps by comparing the surgical outcomes of the conventional versus transverse mini-incision technique for carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of pain and functional outcomes.

Conditions

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conventional open CTR

Conventional open CTR involved making a longitudinal incision in the wrist, typically along the median palmar crease, to access and release the transverse carpal ligament.

PROCEDURE

Transverse mini-incision technique

Mini-incision CTR involved a smaller incision than traditional CTR procedures, aiming to minimize scarring and improve recovery time.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • RESnTEC, Institute of Research

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kashif Raza, FCPS · Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal

  • Muhammad Rashid, FCPS · Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-04-01
Primary Completion
2023-03-31
Completion
2023-03-31

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07018011 on ClinicalTrials.gov