Clinical Utility of a PCR Compared to Culture and Sensitivity Testing for the Management of cUTI in Adults.

NCT06996301 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 773

Last updated 2025-09-11

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) often lead to the overuse of empiric antibiotics, risking inappropriate treatment and contributing to antimicrobial resistance. This randomized, multi-center, investigator-blinded clinical trial is the first global head-to-head comparison of molecular diagnostic testing (Polymerase Chain Reaction : PCR) versus conventional culture and sensitivity (C\&S) for managing cUTIs in adults.

Conducted across six U.S. clinical sites, the study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of PCR-guided treatment relative to C\&S-guided care. Eligible adult patients were randomized 1:1 into two diagnostic arms-PCR or C\&S-after providing informed consent. Urine samples were collected before randomization, tested by both methods, but clinicians remained blinded to the comparator results to avoid bias. Treatment decisions were based only on the assigned test results.

Urine was collected at baseline (Day 1) and at end-of-study (Day 28). Samples were processed centrally: the PCR method (DocLab UTM 2.0) detected 28 uropathogens and 16 antibiotic resistance gene classes; C\&S testing quantified bacterial loads and assessed antimicrobial susceptibility using standard thresholds (≥10⁵ CFU/mL).

The primary endpoint was the number of patients in each arm achieving a Favorable Clinical Outcome (FCl) at Day 28, defined as either:

* Clinical Cure (complete symptom resolution requiring no further antibiotics), or
* Clinical Improvement (partial symptom resolution without new symptoms or IV antibiotics).

Secondary endpoints included:

* Microbiological eradication at EOS (via C\&S and PCR).
* Clinician satisfaction with diagnostic usefulness and result clarity.
* Turnaround time comparison between PCR and C\&S.
* Concordance analysis of test results between PCR and C\&S.
* FCl rates in discordant cases, where PCR and C\&S results disagreed.

Conditions

  • Urinary Tract Infection Complicated
  • Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI)
  • Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Treatment guided by the PCR results

Patients receive treatment prescribed by a blinded clinician, based solely on the PCR diagnostic results

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Treatment guided by the C&S results

Patients receive treatment prescribed by a blinded investigator (clinician), based solely on the C\&S diagnostic results.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dicentra Inc.

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Doc Lab Inc

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Roel Chavez · Doc Lab Inc

  • Thomas K Huard, PhD · MED-US Consulting, LLC

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-07-31
Primary Completion
2024-04-30
Completion
2024-05-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06996301 on ClinicalTrials.gov