MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Holter vs S-Patch for Arrhythmia Detection in Older Falls Patient

NCT06977789 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 73

Last updated 2025-05-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare Holter versus S patch in a group of elderly patients who are referred to the Geriatrics service in Changi General Hospital for falls from Accident and Emergency department, clinic and wards.

The investigator hope to assess the feasibility, adherence and patient acceptability as an alternative to Holter monitoring. The investigator also hope to learn if S-Patch EX monitoring system can be as effective or equivalent to Holter in the monitoring of arrhythmias and the possibility of deploying it for longer term monitoring of arrhythmias.

Participants who consented to be in this study will be offered S patch and Holter consecutively. Holter will be worn for 24 hours and S patch will be worn for 72 hours. The order which Holter or S patch will be worn first will be determined via randomisation.

Conditions

  • Bradyarrhythmia
  • Arrythmia

Interventions

DEVICE

S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex

S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours

DEVICE

Holter

Holter for 24 hours

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Samsung SDS Asia Pacific Pte Ltd

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Changi General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yeo Colin · Changi General Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
60 Years
Max Age
120 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-07-03
Primary Completion
2023-07-31
Completion
2023-12-25

Countries

  • Singapore

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06977789 on ClinicalTrials.gov