MedTrace Logo

T-prf Versus T-prf and Low-level Laser Stimulation on Bone Healing at Posterior Mandibular Fractures

NCT06970379 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 14

Last updated 2025-05-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Different types of grafting substances have been used in the recent decade to accelerate bone healing at large bony facial defects. PRF was one of the gold standard materials to be used until it was replaced by its successor T-PRF due to the PRF hazards of preparation. However, T-PRF- still can't stand alone in full bone enhancement procedure. Therefore, the combination with another bone bio-modulation technique, like Low-level Laser Therapy, is a must to approach the full advantage of bone healing. Aim: To compare between the effect of using T-PRF versus T-PRF with Low Level Laser stimulation on bone healing at posterior mandibular fractures

Conditions

  • Posterior Mandibular Fractures

Interventions

OTHER

T-PRF

Patients received T-PRF placement at the fracture line.

OTHER

T-PRF and Laser biomodulation

Subjects underwent the process of bio-stimulation of the fracture line using low-level laser therapy. Wavelength \[λ\]: 660 nm, Power: 100 mW, Spot size \[Ø\]: 0.06 cm2, and for 60 seconds

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Alexandria University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-03-30
Primary Completion
2025-01-21
Completion
2025-01-21

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06970379 on ClinicalTrials.gov