Comparison of One Anastomisis Gastric Bypass and Duodeno-Jejunostomy for Treating SMA Syndrome
NCT06970093 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2025-12-08
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out which surgery works better to treat people with a rare condition called Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS). This condition causes the duodenum to be squeezed between two arteries, leading to severe nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. The researchers are comparing two types of surgery:
* One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)
* Duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ)
The main questions this study will answer are:
* Which surgery improves symptoms and nutritional status better?
* Which surgery leads to fewer complications and better quality of life?
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgeries
* Be followed for 12 months after the operation
* Complete follow-up visits and nutritional assessments
* Answer questions about their symptoms and overall well-being
Conditions
- Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome
- Duodenal Obstruction
- Weight Loss
- Gastrointestinal Disease
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
Participants will undergo One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), a laparoscopic bariatric procedure that creates a long narrow gastric pouch and anastomoses it to a loop of jejunum approximately 150-200 cm from the ligament of Treitz. This bypasses the compressed duodenum to relieve symptoms of SMAS while promoting weight gain or nutritional restoration in undernourished patients.
- PROCEDURE
-
Duodenojejunostomy
Participants will undergo Duodenojejunostomy (DJ), a standard surgical procedure to bypass the compressed segment of the duodenum. It involves creating an anastomosis between the duodenum and the jejunum distal to the point of compression, allowing normal food passage and relieving symptoms of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohey R Elbanna, MD · Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-03-05
- Primary Completion
- 2024-04-30
- Completion
- 2025-04-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy With Jejuno-ileal Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass
NCT06530212 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Mini Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02882685 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch
NCT02692469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tailored One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
NCT06829381 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MINI Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Bypass: Differences in HOrmonal Secretions at 2 Years of Surgery
NCT03482895 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Could Single-anastomosis Gastric Bypass Be a Curative Treatment for Type II Diabetes?
NCT03412253 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Loop Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT05986890 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Omega Gastric Bypass (150cm) Compared to the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (YOMEGA-2 Multicentric Trial)
NCT06057597 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Long-term Adverse Effects of Gastric Bypass in Omega
NCT04930029 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Omega Loop Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02139813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Weight Loss and Nutritional Deficiency After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass at 150, 170, and 200 cm From the Duodenojejunal Junction
NCT06664099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biliary Limb as a Percentage From the Small Intestine Rather Than Fixed Length in Loop Bypass Surgery for Morbid Obesity
NCT04826055 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Internal Hernia After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
NCT01137201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass As Revisional Procedures Following Failed Restrictive Bariatric Surgery
NCT06794892 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
MGB/OAGB and LSG Effects on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Function
NCT02987673 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Weight Regain
NCT02302898 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Standard Versus "Single Loop" Bypass After Parietal Gastrectomy
NCT07115836 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Stomach and Pouch Reduction in Patients With Weight Regain Following Roux-En-Y Bypass Surgery
NCT00411489 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MGB/OAGB Versus RYGB After Failed Sleeve
NCT03526783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Symptomatic Gastric Sleeve Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04781946 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Clinical Trial
NCT04649619 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure
NCT04450082 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass
NCT02601092 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Severe Obesity in 6,722 Patients: Early Outcomes From the Assuta Surgery Registry
NCT05481853 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Gastric Band, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass Surgeries
NCT02004561 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING