Effect of Colloids Versus Crystalloids on Heart Mechanics: a Double-blind Cross Over Randomized Trial

NCT06900972 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16

Last updated 2025-03-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The debate over whether to use colloid or crystalloid solutions for fluid resuscitationis still ongoing. Colloid solutions consist of large molecules that generally cannot pass through healthy capillary membranes, whereas crystalloid solutions contain ions that easily move from the intravascular space to the interstitial compartment. Therefore, it is traditionally argued that colloids are more effective at expanding intravascular volume, with a suggested ratio of 1:3 compared to crystalloids. However, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that resuscitation with one type of fluid is more effective or safer than t he other. Despite these theoretically advantageousphysiological properties, colloids have not demonstrated a clear hemodynamic benefit over crystalloids. We hypothesized that these unexpected discrepancies may be attributed to different mechanical heart responses.

Conditions

  • Fluid Reponsiveness
  • Fluid Resuscitation
  • Fluid Therapy

Interventions

DRUG

Gelafundin

Volunteers will undergo a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography to measure left ventricular torsion, global longitudinal strain, left atrial strain and free wall right ventricular strain before any intervention. Initially, 500 ml of the specified but blinded solution will be administered, followed by a repeat of the echocardiographic process. Subsequently, an additional 500 ml will be given, totaling 1000 ml, and strain curves will be reacquired. After a washout period of 7 days, the same procedure will be repeated with the second solution.

DRUG

Saline (NaCl 0,9 %) (placebo)

Volunteers will undergo a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography to measure left ventricular torsion, global longitudinal strain, left atrial strain and free wall right ventricular strain before any intervention. Initially, 500 ml of the specified but blinded solution will be administered, followed by a repeat of the echocardiographic process. Subsequently, an additional 500 ml will be given, totaling 1000 ml, and strain curves will be reacquired. After a washout period of 7 days, the same procedure will be repeated with the second solution

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Monastir

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-04-01
Primary Completion
2025-08-30
Completion
2025-09-30

Countries

  • Tunisia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06900972 on ClinicalTrials.gov