Prospective Observational Pilot Study of LMWH Versus UFH as ECMO Anticoagulation in Lung Transplantation

NCT06868823 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2025-06-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this observational pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) as anticoagulation in perioperative ECMO during bilateral lung transplantation.

The main question this study seeks to answer is:

Does LMWH provide a safe and effective alternative to UFH for ECMO anticoagulation in lung transplantation, with reduced bleeding and thrombotic complications?

Patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation with perioperative veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO support will be assigned to one of two anticoagulation strategies:

UFH group: Standard UFH anticoagulation monitored using ROTEM. LMWH group: Enoxaparin-based anticoagulation monitored using ROTEM. The study will assess perioperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels, transfusion needs, and thrombotic events. Additional analyses will include coagulation profile assessments using point-of-care (POC) tests, thrombin generation test (TGT), and laboratory coagulation parameters.

Conditions

  • Lung Transplantation
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Anticoagulants and Bleeding Disorders

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Motol

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-05-01
Primary Completion
2025-12-31
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • Czechia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06868823 on ClinicalTrials.gov