PPOS Protocol Versus GnRH Anatagonist for Expected Normal Responder Patients Undergoing ART : a Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT06868576 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 328

Last updated 2025-03-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol in expected normal responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). By evaluating key clinical outcomes, including ovarian response, embryological parameters, and pregnancy rates, this study seeks to determine the relative advantages and limitations of each protocol.

Conditions

  • PPOS
  • GnRH Antagonist
  • Assisted Reproductive Techniques

Interventions

DRUG

Dydrogesterone Oral Tablet

Dydrogesterone 20mg tablets daily in PPOS protocol in ovarian stimulation starting from day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle until the triggering day

DRUG

Cetrorelix (Cetrotide)

This will be the conventional antagonist in ovarian stimulation given from day 6 of the menstrual cycle until the triggering day

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kasr El Aini Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
39 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-01-03
Primary Completion
2024-10-31
Completion
2025-02-28

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06868576 on ClinicalTrials.gov