MedTrace Logo

Comparison Volume-controlled Ventilation, Pressure-controlled Volume-guaranteed Ventilation, and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position

NCT06861959 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-03-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Objective:

This study aimed to compare the effects of three different mechanical ventilation modes-Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV), Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV), and Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)-on pulmonary and hemodynamic variables during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. The hypothesis was that PCV and PCV-VG would be superior to VCV in optimizing respiratory mechanics and improving oxygenation, particularly by reducing peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak).

Methods:

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sixty ASA I-III patients aged 20-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position were included (20 patients per ventilation group).

Patients were randomized into VCV, PCV, and PCV-VG groups. Intraoperative ventilation was performed with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and intra-abdominal pressure maintained at 12-14 mmHg.

Data were collected at four time points: T1 (after induction, supine), T2 (30 min after CO2 insufflation, Trendelenburg), T3 (60 min after pneumoperitoneum), and T4 (after CO2 deflation, supine).

Primary outcome: Ppeak comparison between groups. Secondary outcomes: Dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean), gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters.

Conditions

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
  • Peak Inspiratuar Pressure

Interventions

DEVICE

Device: Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV)

Tidal volume: 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) level of 30-35 mmHg Inspiratory-expiratory ratio: 1:2 PEEP: 5 cmH₂O Mechanical ventilation was provided using a Datex-Ohmeda Avance Anesthesia Machine (GE Healthcare, USA) Measurements were taken at four predefined time points (T1-T4)

DEVICE

Device: Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV)

Initial peak inspiratory pressure adjusted to deliver a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) level of 30-35 mmHg Inspiratory-expiratory ratio: 1:2 PEEP: 5 cmH₂O Mechanical ventilation was provided using a Datex-Ohmeda Avance Anesthesia Machine (GE Healthcare, USA) Measurements were taken at four predefined time points (T1-T4)

DEVICE

Device: Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)

Pressure-controlled mode with volume guarantee to maintain a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) level of 30-35 mmHg Inspiratory-expiratory ratio: 1:2 PEEP: 5 cmH₂O Mechanical ventilation was provided using a Datex-Ohmeda Avance Anesthesia Machine (GE Healthcare, USA) Measurements were taken at four predefined time points (T1-T4)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-01
Primary Completion
2021-08-01
Completion
2021-09-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06861959 on ClinicalTrials.gov