Fluoroscopic-Guided Bipolar Versus Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency for Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia

NCT06779578 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2025-01-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A prospective exploratory study aiming at comparing pulsed bipolar versus pulsed unipolar radiofrequency ablation in patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia.

Conditions

  • Trigeminal Neuralgia
  • Refractory Pain

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency

Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency ablation: the active comparator

PROCEDURE

Mopolar pulsed radiofrequency

Monopolar pulsed radiofrequency ablation: the placebo

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Alexandria University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-01-01
Primary Completion
2025-06-01
Completion
2025-09-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06779578 on ClinicalTrials.gov