Intrathecal Morphine Injection Versus Continuous Wound Infiltration After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

NCT06761989 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104

Last updated 2025-03-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective randomized open-label noninferiority trial that compares intrathecal morphine injection and continuous wound infiltration after open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Conditions

  • Pain Management
  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

DEVICE

Continuous wound infiltration

Prior to closure of the abdominal wall, a catheter is placed in the preperitoneal space lateral to the surgical incision through the tunneler. The catheter is connected to a prepared infusion pump (275 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, 4 ml/hr/catheter), and the remaining catheter protruding from the abdomen is secured with a catheterization dressing. The preperitoneal catheter is removed in the afternoon of postoperative day 3.

DRUG

Intrathecal morphine injection

A single dose of intrathecal morphine is administered prior to induction of general anesthesia. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position on the bed and a 25 guage quincke spinal needle is inserted intrathecally at the L4/5 median or paramedian approach to administer 0.2 mg of morphine.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-01-15
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2027-01-07

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06761989 on ClinicalTrials.gov